You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Title Metalinks could be significantly smaller if not all mirrors are
listed
Priority wish Status chatting
Superseder Nosy List poeml
Assigned To poeml Keywords
Issue migrated (2015-06-05) from old issue tracker http://mirrorbrain.org/issues/issue76
msg281 (view) Author: poeml Date: 2010-09-24.15:17:39
Looking at the size of Metalinks, it is apparent that they can become quite
large, if they contain a lot of mirrors.
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 13130 Sep 24 16:49 metalink with ~100 mirrors
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1575 Sep 24 16:49 metalink with 1 mirror
Of course, compression would alleviate the problem:
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 2635 Sep 24 16:49 metalink with ~100 mirrors.gz
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1012 Sep 24 16:49 metalink with 1 mirror.gz
I think it might be useful to limit the number of mirrors to, let's say, 15-30,
and thereby limit the size of metalinks.
(end of migrated issue)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: